There is a simple version of popcorn seeds for planting and a complete version. Both are here, in that order.
Half the confusion online comes from people answering a slightly different question than the one asked. The complicated explanation and the simple one usually describe the same thing at different zoom levels. Where two methods both work, prefer the one with fewer places to go wrong.
Short version
Get the basic version working, confirm it, and only then optimise — reversing that order is where most of the time goes.
When to stop optimising
The obvious approach works; the rest of this page is about making it work the first time. The optimal approach and the reliable approach diverge more than people expect. Doing this without understanding it works fine until something changes, which it will. There is a point where further refinement stops being worth the time, and it arrives early.
The second time takes a fraction as long, which makes the first attempt worth doing carefully. Most of the disagreement online here comes from people describing different versions. The community figured most of this out through repetition, and the pattern has held up well.
The straightforward version
If something here stops matching what you see on screen, the game has probably changed a value in an update. Where a guide and the game disagree, the game is right and the guide is old. Details that seem cosmetic occasionally are not, which is why the order is specified.
Doing it faster once you know the method
It is worth reading the whole section before starting, even though nobody ever does. Two answers to popcorn seeds for planting circulate online, and both were correct at some point. Where several approaches exist, the popular one is popular for being easy to explain rather than best.
- Change one thing at a time and check the result.
- Stop once you have a working result rather than optimising forever.
- Keep the original settings somewhere you can restore them from.
- Write down what you changed, so you can undo it if the result gets worse.
Related things worth knowing
Consistency beats optimisation until you are comfortable, and often after that too. Keep the first attempt simple and add refinements only after it works. If the explanation feels overcomplicated, it probably is — the working version is usually short.
Doing this properly once is faster than doing it approximately three times. Most advice on this topic assumes you already know half the answer, which is exactly the problem. The step people skip is almost always the one that makes the rest reliable.
- Confirm the starting conditions before following any steps.
- Do the boring preparation step, even when it looks skippable.
- Prefer the approach with fewer steps that can fail.
- Check which version you are on before trusting any specific numbers.
Common ways this goes sideways
- Assuming a failed attempt means the method is wrong rather than the execution.
- Assuming a step took effect without checking.
- Reading only the summary and missing the condition it depended on.
Other things people ask
Can I undo it?
Yes, in nearly every case. Anything permanent is flagged in the steps, and there is usually a safer route worth considering first.
Is the longer method worth it?
Only if the short one has already failed for you. Starting with the complicated version is how simple problems become long evenings.
Why do two sources say different things?
Almost always because they are describing different versions, or because one of them repeated an assumption without testing it.
Does this apply to every version?
The steps target the current release. Older versions usually behave the same way, though menus may sit in different places.
None of popcorn seeds for planting is difficult in isolation — the difficulty was only ever in the sequence.