Searches like easiest fruit to grow usually come from a specific moment of being stuck, so this starts with the answer and explains the reasoning afterwards.
If something here stops matching what you see on screen, the game has probably changed a value in an update. Anything presented as a hidden trick is normally just a step that a popular guide left out. If the explanation feels overcomplicated, it probably is — the working version is usually short. The optimal approach and the reliable approach diverge more than people expect.
Before the details
If you only do one thing from this page, do the first step properly.
Getting a better result
The step people skip is almost always the one that makes the rest reliable. Where several approaches exist, the popular one is popular for being easy to explain rather than best. Most advice on this topic assumes you already know half the answer, which is exactly the problem. It is worth knowing which part of this the game actually enforces and which part is convention.
- Confirm the result immediately rather than later.
- Write down what worked, in case you need it again later.
- Test one change at a time instead of five at once.
- Try it once without shortcuts to see the full behaviour.
Edge cases worth knowing
Two answers to easiest fruit to grow circulate online, and both were correct at some point. Details that seem cosmetic occasionally are not, which is why the order is specified. If you are short on time, the first section alone is usually enough.
How to check it worked
Where a guide and the game disagree about easiest fruit to grow, the game is right and the guide is old. The second time takes a fraction as long, which makes the first attempt worth doing carefully. Keep expectations proportional to the effort — this is a solved problem, not a research project.
When to stop optimising
There is a point where further refinement stops being worth the time, and it arrives early. A result that works but that you cannot explain will not survive the next change. Start with the simplest option before touching anything that is hard to reverse. Keep the first attempt simple and add refinements only after it works.
Terminology differs between communities more than the underlying behaviour does. Assume anything automated in the interface has an edge case, because it usually does. Most guides are written once and never revisited, which is worth remembering when one does not match.
Related things worth knowing
Doing this properly once is faster than doing it approximately three times. Where a guide and the game disagree, the game is right and the guide is old. It is worth reading the whole section before starting, even though nobody ever does.
The useful answer is usually one sentence long, and everything else is the reasoning behind it. The result is consistent once the inputs are, which is less obvious than it sounds. A change that helps one setup can quietly hurt another, which is why one-at-a-time testing pays off.
What goes wrong most often
- Mixing instructions from two versions and getting neither.
- Skipping the preparation step because it looks boring, then repeating the hard part four times.
- Following the detailed method when the simple one would have done.
Quick answers
Does this still work after the latest update?
It did at the time of writing. If a step no longer matches, the underlying idea normally still applies even when a menu has moved.
Is there an easier way?
Often, but the easy route tends to be less reliable. The method above trades a couple of extra minutes for a result that works the first time.
Is any of this reversible?
Nearly all of it. Anything that is not is flagged in the steps, and there is normally a safer alternative worth considering first.
Is there a faster method?
Usually yes, and usually it is riskier. The route above trades a little speed for a much lower chance of having to start over.
If a future patch changes something here, the reasoning should still point you at the fix.